NBA scouts have recently had excellent opportunities to evaluate potential draftees during conference championships and the first week of the NCAA Tournament.
As the season progresses, NBA teams are actively refining their draft boards, with almost every franchise now having a working list of top prospects.
Here is an updated mock draft, reflecting observations from recent weeks, presented in the draft order according to Tankathon.
2025 NBA Mock Draft – Round 1
Pick | Team | Player | Position | College/Team | Stats | Analysis |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pick 1 | Washington | Cooper Flagg | PF | Duke • Fr • 6`9` / 205 lbs | PPG: 18.7, RPG: 7.5, APG: 4.1, 3P%: 36.3% | The Washington team would greatly benefit from drafting Flagg, who is widely anticipated to be the top pick. This highly versatile player could potentially reach the levels of Anthony Davis and Zion Williamson, especially if he becomes college basketball`s Player of the Year and then the first overall pick. His shooting and ability to create his own shots have significantly improved, adding to his already impressive defense, competitiveness, passing, and athleticism. |
Pick 2 | Utah | Dylan Harper | PG | Rutgers • Fr • 6`6` / 215 lbs | PPG: 19.4, RPG: 4.6, APG: 4, 3P%: 33.3% | While Rutgers` season was underwhelming, Harper demonstrated his value when healthy, showcasing his abilities as a large point guard capable of scoring and facilitating. His shooting, initially a concern, was inconsistent, ending the season at 33% from three-point range. Teams considering him will closely examine his shooting and health, as durability questions arose this season. However, his performance in his single season at Rutgers has positioned him favorably for the draft. |
Pick 3 | Charlotte | Ace Bailey | SF | Rutgers • Fr • 6`10` / 200 lbs | PPG: 17.6, RPG: 7.2, APG: 1.3, 3P%: 34.6% | Ace Bailey remains a top prospect. Despite Rutgers` disappointing season and Bailey`s inconsistency, he has shown glimpses of why he was a highly-rated high school prospect. His wing size, athleticism, and shooting ability are significant assets. Teams will be further evaluating his overall game and low assist numbers, but his potential remains very high. |
Pick 4 | New Orleans | VJ Edgecombe | SG | Baylor • Fr • 6`5` / 180 lbs | PPG: 15, RPG: 5.6, APG: 3.2, 3P%: 34% | Edgecombe improved his draft stock in the latter part of the season, especially during a strong run in late January before an ankle injury. His athleticism, defensive skills, and competitive nature are clear strengths. He has shown development in his shooting and overall guard skills, establishing a solid foundation. However, opinions vary widely regarding his offensive ceiling and potential for further growth. |
Pick 5 | Philadelphia | Tre Johnson | SF | Texas • Fr • 6`6` / 190 lbs | PPG: 19.9, RPG: 3.1, APG: 2.7, 3P%: 39.7% | Johnson had a remarkable season at Texas, averaging 20 points with efficient shooting percentages (43% FG, 40% 3PT, 87% FT) while maintaining a good assist-to-turnover ratio (2.7 to 1.8). He was a primary focus for opposing defenses nightly. Although there`s room to refine his decision-making, his scoring ability, size for his position, and demonstrated efficiency are strong indicators of his NBA potential. |
Pick 6 | Brooklyn | Kon Knueppel |